Fix doxygen "Creating a new factor"
I think NonlinearFactor1, NonlinearFactor2, ... is supposed to say NoiseModelFactor1, NoiseModelFactor2, ...release/4.3a0
							parent
							
								
									4ac78953ae
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						96f90c3f13
					
				|  | @ -17,11 +17,11 @@ To use GTSAM to solve your own problems, you will often have to create new facto | |||
| 
 | ||||
| -# The number of variables your factor involves is <b>unknown</b> at compile time - derive from NoiseModelFactor and implement NoiseModelFactor::unwhitenedError() | ||||
|    - This is a factor expressing the sum-of-squares error between a measurement \f$ z \f$ and a measurement prediction function \f$ h(x) \f$, on which the errors are expected to follow some distribution specified by a noise model (see noiseModel). | ||||
| -# The number of variables your factor involves is <b>known</b> at compile time and is between 1 and 6 - derive from NonlinearFactor1, NonlinearFactor2, NonlinearFactor3, NonlinearFactor4, NonlinearFactor5, or NonlinearFactor6, and implement <b>\c evaluateError()</b> | ||||
| -# The number of variables your factor involves is <b>known</b> at compile time and is between 1 and 6 - derive from NoiseModelFactor1, NoiseModelFactor2, NoiseModelFactor3, NoiseModelFactor4, NoiseModelFactor5, or NoiseModelFactor6, and implement <b>\c evaluateError()</b> | ||||
|    - This factor expresses the same sum-of-squares error with a noise model, but makes the implementation task slightly easier than with %NoiseModelFactor. | ||||
| -# Derive from NonlinearFactor | ||||
|    - This is more advanced and allows creating factors without an explicit noise model, or that linearize to HessianFactor instead of JacobianFactor. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| */ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| } | ||||
| } | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue